The integration of spatial and temporal information is a prerequisite for skilled movements. Likewise, spatial and temporal information must be integrated to predict the potential collision (or otherwise) of two moving objects. In a previous blocked functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study [Neuroimage 20 (2003) S82] we showed that collision judgments (relative to size judgments) provoked a significant increase in neural activity in the left inferior parietal cortex (supramarginal gyrus). This result suggests that this region is involved in the integration of perceptual spatiotemporal information in addition to its known involvement in programming skilled actions. To further investigate the impact of the integration of temporal and spatial information on the left parietal cortex we conducted an event-related fMRI study in which we varied the difficulty of the collision (and the size) judgment tasks parametrically. Reaction times and error rates were used as behavioral measures of increasing task demands. There was a significant linear increase in reaction times and error rates during the collision and the size tasks over the four levels of task difficulty. A linear increase of the blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the left inferior parietal cortex was found only for the collision, not for the size, conditions. Neural activation in the left inferior parietal cortex thus paralleled the increasing demands on spatiotemporal integration. This result confirms that the left supramarginal gyrus integrates spatial and temporal information irrespective of motor demands.

Spatial and nonspatial auditory tasks preferentially recruit dorsal and ventral brain areas, respectively. However, the extent to which these auditory differences reflect specific aspects of mental processing has not been directly studied. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, participants encoded and maintained either the location or the identity of a sound for a delay period of several seconds and then subsequently compared that information with a second sound. Relative to sound localization, sound identification was associated with greater hemodynamic activity in the left rostral superior temporal gyrus. In contrast, localizing sounds recruited greater activity in the parietal cortex, posterior temporal lobe, and superior frontal sulcus. The identification differences were most prominent during the early stage of the trial, whereas the location differences were most evident during the late (i.e., comparison) stage. Accordingly, our results suggest that auditory spatial and identity dissociations as revealed by functional imaging may be dependent to some degree on the type of processing being carried out. In addition, dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral superior parietal areas showed greater activity during the comparison as opposed to the earlier stage of the trial, regardless of the type of auditory task, consistent with results from visual working memory studies.

Results from several recent studies suggest that neuronal processing of sound content and its spatial location may be dissociated. The use of modern neuroimaging techniques has allowed for the determination that different brain structures may be specifically activated during working memory processing of pitch and location of sound. The time course of these task-related differences, however, remains uncertain. In the present study, we performed simultaneous whole-head electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram recordings, using a new behavioral paradigm, to investigate the dynamics of differences between "what" and "where" evoked responses in the auditory system as a function of memory load. In the location task the latency of the N1m was shorter and its generator was situated more inferiorly than in the pitch task. Working memory processing of the tonal frequency enhanced the amplitude of the N2 component, as well as the negative-going deflection at a latency around 400 ms. A memory-load-dependent task-related difference was found in the positive slow wave which was higher during the location than pitch task at the low load. Late slow waves were affected by memory load but not type of task. These results suggest that separate neuronal networks are involved in the attribute-specific analysis of auditory stimuli and their encoding into working memory, whereas the maintenance of auditory information is accomplished by a common, nonspecific neuronal network.