OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation between plasma concentration of the N terminal of the precursor of brain natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with a history of hypertension. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital based study. PATIENTS: NT proBNP concentrations were determined in five groups of individuals. Group 1: 15 echocardiographic normal controls; group 2: 22 patients with hypertension, normal left ventricular systolic function, and no LVH; group 3: 24 patients with hypertension, normal left ventricular systolic function, and LVH; group 4: 13 patients with history of hypertension, no history of ischaemic heart disease, and left ventricular wall motion index (WMI) between 1.9-1.3; and group 5:17 patients with a history of hypertension, no history of ischaemic heart disease, and WMI < 1.2. RESULTS: Median (range) NT proBNP concentrations (in fmol/ml) for groups 1-5, respectively, were: 129.4 (53.6-159.7), 147.4 (54.3-730. 5), 137.1 (35.8-403.9), 356.7 (124.4-934.4), and 493.5 (248.9-909). Mean log NT proBNP differed among all five groups (p < 0.0001), and between groups 4 and 5 versus groups 1-3 (p < 0.0001), and group 4 versus group 5 (p = 0.02) only. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the presence of hypertension with or without LVH (and normal left ventricular systolic function) does not affect NT proBNP concentrations. Moreover, there is a significant rise in NT proBNP only when LVSD develops in hypertension. Thus, NT proBNP remains a useful diagnostic aid for LVSD, even in hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVES: Betablockers have been convincingly shown to reduce total and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of hypertensive diabetic patients. In diabetic patients, after myocardial infarction, these agents confer a twice as high protective effect when compared to non-diabetic patients. However, most paradoxically, betablocking agents are used less frequently in diabetes. Control of hypertension is insufficient in most of the diabetic patients, probably because a combination of antihypertensive agents including betablockers is frequently needed to sufficiently control blood pressure but is not used in these patients. The fear of betablocker-associated side effects in diabetes may be partly responsible for the frequent antihypertensive mono-therapy and the resulting poor quality of blood pressure control among diabetic patients. DESIGN: We have performed an analysis of the literature to assess whether possible adverse metabolic effects, a higher risk of hypoglycaemia or less nephroprotective effects of beta1-selective betablocking agents could justify the reticence in prescribing these antihypertensive agents to diabetic patients. RESULTS: A thorough review of the literature does not indicate that beta1-selective betablocking agents have important adverse effects on glucose metabolism, prolong hypoglycaemia or mask hypoglycaemic symptoms. In diabetic nephropathy, betablockers are as nephroprotective as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The unnecessary less frequent prescription of beta1-selective betablockers in diabetes mellitus may contribute to the higher cardiovascular mortality among these patients.

In hypertensive diabetic patients, reducing blood pressure is among the best evaluated and most effective interventions for lowering mortality and morbidity. First line antihypertensive agents are: chlorthalidone or other thiazide-type diuretics, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors. In type 2 diabetic patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, the ARB Cosaar has been proven to be effective. To achieve an effective blood pressure reduction, a combination of different antihypertensive agents is necessary for most patients. Specially structured patient education programmes are another effective means of achieving this goal.