Free online reference management for clinicians and scientists

Sign up now

Recent "science publishing" articles

  • These articles and links have been posted by Connotea users using the tag "science publishing".
  • To add to this collection, or to start your own library:

Learn more

Watch a short video (2m 41s)

EXPORT LIST RSS ?
Bookmarks matching tag "science publishing"
 
Number of articles per page:
10 | 25 | 50 | 100
 
PLoS Computational Biology: Adventures in Semantic Publishing: Exemplar Semantic Enhancements of a Research Article
www.ploscompbiol.org
An existence proof of the kind of research articles we might have if all the current semantic tools we applied. And a description of the work involved.
 
Is scientific publishing about to be disrupted?
Michael Nielsen
Michael Nielsen, (29 Jun 2009)
M. Nielsen makes the case for technology-driven publishing as the future for science publishing.
 
Copyright Notices in Traditional and New Media Journals: Lies, Damned Lies, and Copyright Notices
Nathaniel Poor
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (1), 101 (2008)
 
Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns
Michelle Gittelman and Bruce Kogut
Management Science 49 (4), 366-82 (Apr 2003)
Authors self-archived version available here: http://www.lem.sssup.it/epip/kogut_1.pdf
 
Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals
S. Liebowitz
Journal of Political Economy 93 (5), 945 (01 Jan 1985)
 
Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?
Virginia Walbot
Journal of Biology 8 (3), 24 (09 Mar 2009)
 
Is Peer Review Censorship?
Arturo Casadevall and Ferric C. Fang
Infection and Immunity, IAI.00018-09 (17 Feb 2009)
 
What are journals for?
Journal of Biology 8 (1), 1 (27 Jan 2009)
 
Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
Neal S. Young, John P. A. Ioannidis, and Omar Al-Ubaydli
PLoS Medicine 5 (10), e201 (01 Oct 2008)
 
Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
Ulrich Poschl
Learned Publishing 17 (2), 105-13 (01 Apr 2004)
"In the first stage, manuscripts that pass an efficient access peer-review or pre- selection by the editor are immediately published in a scientific discussion forum on the Internet. Then they are made available for full interactive peer review and public discussion, during which the comments of referees (anonymous or attributed), additional short comments by other scientists (attributed) and the authors’ replies are published alongside the discussion paper...To ensure publication precedence for authors and to provide a lasting record of scientific discussion, the discussion papers and interactive comments are permanently archived and fully citable...In the second stage, the peer-review process is completed and final revised papers are published in the scientific journal . Completion of peer review and the final editorial decision to publish are performed as in traditional scientific journals."

<< Prev 0      Showing entries 1 to 10 of 257 total      Next 10 >>