Free online reference management for clinicians and scientists

Sign up now

Recent "readability" articles

  • These articles and links have been posted by Connotea users using the tag "readability".
  • To add to this collection, or to start your own library:

Learn more

Watch a short video (2m 41s)

EXPORT LIST RSS ?
Bookmarks matching tag readability
 
Number of articles per page:
10 | 25 | 50 | 100
 
Did you get that?
Web copy that people read, (25 Jun 2009)
How clear is YOUR message? Are you sure people really understand?
 
More readable documents
Web copy that people read, (24 Jun 2009)
How people get your message - putting the key information in the right place
 
Readability in LMSs, Pt. 2
www.coggno.com
Making your LMS text readable may sound like an easy task–just make the language simple and to-the-point, right? But it’s not quite as easy as you may think. It requires method, training, and practice. But is it really an important and effective aspect of LMS design?
 
Readability in LMSs, Pt. 1
www.coggno.com
In the creation of your LMS, readability is just one important aspect. Readability refers to the ease with which an audience processes the presented information. For example, short sentences are preferable to long sentences. Syntax, or word order, is another important element.
 
How well does your website work?
Web copy that people read, (20 May 2009)
Get your site tested by typical users.
 
10 tips to keep people on your website
Web copy that people read, (19 May 2009)
How to reduce your bounce rates and increase retention of visitors to your website
 
Have you got a route map for your website?
Web copy that people read, (12 May 2009)
Helping people to get what they want from your website
 
7 things that stop people reading
Web copy that people read, (01 May 2009)
 
Health literacy and the World Wide Web: comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet.
D B Friedman, L Hoffman-Goetz, and J F Arocha
Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine 31 (1), 67-87 (Mar 2006)
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to assess the readability level of Web-based information on leading incident cancers.RESEARCH DESIGN: websites on breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers were selected for analysis by comparing the first 100 hits across 10 popular search engines. A total of 100 websites on breast (n=33), prostate (n=34), and colorectal (n=33) cancers were included in the final analysis.METHODS: readability was assessed using SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid (F - K), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) measures. SMOG was hand-calculated on 10 - 30 lines of continuous text. Identical text was entered into Microsoft Word 2002 where F - K and FRE scores were determined automatically by the word processor.RESULTS: the mean readability score of the cancer websites was Grade 12.9 using SMOG and Grade 10.7 according to F - K. The mean FRE score was 45.3, a score considered 'difficult'. Colorectal cancer websites were most difficult to read compared to breast and prostate cancer websites. All measures indicated that prostate cancer websites were written at the lowest readability. Significantly higher reading levels were required for concluding paragraphs of Web articles compared to introduction paragraphs.CONCLUSIONS: findings suggest the need for readable cancer information on the Web. Health promoters, health informaticians, medical journalists, and web page editors must collaborate to ensure the use of plain language to match the literacy skills of consumers.
 
Scrolling the Scroll: e-Books beyond 2007
Chris Armstrong
info NeoGnostic, (25 Oct 2007)
Posted by ChrisinWales (who is an author) and 1 other to Readability ebooks reading e-books on Thu Oct 25 2007 at 15:54 UTC | info | related

<< Prev 0      Showing entries 1 to 10 of 19 total      Next 9 >>