Free online reference management for clinicians and scientists

Sign up now

Recent "clinical trials" articles

  • These articles and links have been posted by Connotea users using the tag "clinical trials".
  • To add to this collection, or to start your own library:

Learn more

Watch a short video (2m 41s)

EXPORT LIST RSS ?
Bookmarks matching tag "clinical trials"
 
Number of articles per page:
10 | 25 | 50 | 100
 
Do hospital fall prevention programs work?: A systematic review.
D. Oliver, A. Hopper, and P. Seed
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48 (12), 1679-89 (2000)
 
Surgeons and research: no cutting edge
www.ft.com
Surgeons are widely regarded as the monarchs of medicine. Their intellectual brilliance and manual dexterity may indeed be outstanding but there is one vital aspect of healthcare in which they lag behind the medical profession as a whole: research.
 
Progress and Deficiencies in the Registration of Clinical Trials
Alastair J.J. Wood
The New England Journal of Medicine 360 (8), 824-30 (19 Feb 2009)
Issues with registration of clinical trials
Posted by calistoga to clinical trials on Sat May 23 2009 at 01:42 UTC | info | related
 
Pilot Trials in Clinical Research: Of What Value Are They?
Joseph Loscalzo
Circulation 119 (13), (07 Apr 2009)
Pilot trials are exploratory studies limited in size and scope that give insight into the actions, efficacy, and safety of a drug or device but cannot provide definitive support for specific mechanistic or therapeutic claims. I feel it is important to appreciate their appropriate use and key limitations for clinical and translational cardiovascular research.
Posted by hjaqu001 to clinical trials on Mon Apr 06 2009 at 21:32 UTC | info | related
 
Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews
Fujian Song et al.
BMJ 338 (apr03_1), b1147 (03 Apr 2009)
Identified methodological problems were an unclear understanding of underlying assumptions, inappropriate search and selection of relevant trials, use of inappropriate or flawed methods, lack of objective and validated methods to assess or improve trial similarity, and inadequate comparison or inappropriate combination of direct and indirect evidence. Adequate understanding of basic assumptions underlying indirect and mixed treatment comparison is crucial to resolve these methodological problems.
Posted by hjaqu001 to clinical trials on Sat Apr 04 2009 at 09:02 UTC | info | related
 
Researchers Left To Guess at Outcomes of Most Cancer Clinical Trials
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101 (2), 72 (2009)
Posted by tjhughes43 to clinical trials on Wed Feb 04 2009 at 04:39 UTC | info | related
 
Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer
Rakesh Jain et al.
Nat Clin Prac Oncol 3 (1), 24-40 (Jan 2006)
Posted by vzb10326 and 2 others to clinical trials on Wed Jan 28 2009 at 11:11 UTC | info | related
 
Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER)
The Lancet Oncology 8 (12), 1079 (2007)
 
Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial
Hervé Bonnefoi et al.
The lancet oncology 8 (12), 1071-8 (Dec 2007)
 
How to critically appraise an article
Jane Young and Michael Solomon
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, published online 20 Jan 2009
This Review presents a 10-step guide to critical appraisal that aims to assist clinicians to identify the most relevant high-quality studies available to guide their clinical practice.

<< Prev 0      Showing entries 1 to 10 of 312 total      Next 10 >>