Comments for doi:10.1045/december2004-hammond

The Role of RSS in Science Publishing: Syndication and Annotation on the Web

timo said on Thu Feb 17 2005 at 22:54 UTC:

The authors of this paper will monitor with interest any comments about it posted here.

joanna said on Fri Feb 18 2005 at 09:54 UTC:

I'd be interested to know what the authors or other people think about RSS 1.1

timo said on Fri Feb 18 2005 at 11:16 UTC:

We (the authors) think that RSS 1.0 could do with some fixes, but we're not quite sure that RSS 1.1 is the best way to do this.

joanna said on Fri Feb 18 2005 at 16:29 UTC:

What are the fixes you think are the most important for 1.0?

hratner said on Sat Mar 12 2005 at 03:24 UTC:

I would like the authors to explain how RDF could be made easier to implement and/or explained. If this happened, more people might flock to version 1.0.

TroubledYouth said on Tue Jan 23 2007 at 12:58 UTC:

Well, joanna, I would have enjoyed “other people’s opinions” like you. As far as I know it work much better on internationalization support and cosmopolitanism is no stranger to Internet, isn’t it. It is a great step ahead from RSS 1.0. What is interesting in this 1.1 is the fact that the guys that worked on it made possible that 1.1 made use of the extension modules.
-------
If you want your children to keep their feet on the ground, put some responsibilities on their shoulders. Boys Ranch

seo said on Tue Feb 20 2007 at 09:44 UTC:

RSS has further revolutionized the idea of globalization and search engines.

Internet Seo Design

carmas27 said on Thu Aug 09 2007 at 08:53 UTC:

Interesante artículo para InforMed

Comments for doi:10.1045/december2004-hammond

Log in